grizzly bear vs hippopotamus

The inland North American brown bear, smaller than coastal populations because it eats less salmon. A semi-aquatic grazer, the third-heaviest land mammal and among the most dangerous to people. On the measurements below, hippopotamus leads on more of them — but they do not all point the same way, and the ones that disagree are the interesting part.

The measurements

Where each one leads

• Mass: hippopotamus is 5.6× heavier.
• Length: hippopotamus is 1.8× longer.
• Height: hippopotamus is 1.5× taller.
• Top speed: grizzly bear is 1.9× faster.
• Bite force: hippopotamus is 1.8× a stronger bite.
• Lifespan: hippopotamus is 1.8× a longer life.

What this does and does not tell you

These are measured averages with real ranges behind them, and every figure links to its own page. What they cannot do is settle an encounter. Outcomes between animals turn on circumstance — who initiates, whether either is hungry, defending young, injured or cornered, and what the terrain favours. Size and bite force are not decisive on their own, and most of these pairs never meet in the wild in any case, because their ranges do not overlap.

Every figure here is an average with a substantial spread. Individual animals vary enormously — a large individual of the smaller species routinely exceeds a small individual of the larger one.