American football field vs Running track
American football field vs running track
Running track is larger on length
Running track is 3.6× American football field on length.
An American football field and a running track can be compared on 3 measures. The figures below are typical adult or full-size values, with the larger of the two in bold.
Side by side
| American football field | Running track | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 91.44–109.7 m | 400 m |
| Width | 48.76 m | 9.76 m |
| Area | 5,351 m² | 14,000–16,000 m² |
What the numbers say
- Running track is 3.6× American football field on length.
- American football field is 5× running track on width.
- Running track is 2.8× American football field on area.
Length compared.
Running track 400 m
American football field 91.44–109.7 m
American football field
A regulation American football field: 100 yards of play plus two 10-yard end zones.
Running track
A standard outdoor athletics track: 400 m around lane one, with 84.39 m straights and two semicircular bends.
This is a comparison of published measurements, nothing more. It describes how two things differ on measures that have been recorded; it does not predict how they would fare against each other in any situation.
Common questions
- Which is bigger, American football field or running track?
- Running track is 3.6× American football field on length. Both figures are typical values; the full range for each is in the table above.
- How do American football fields and running tracks compare on width?
- American football field: 48.76 m. Running track: 9.76 m. American football field is 5× running track on width.
- How do American football fields and running tracks compare on area?
- American football field: 5,351 m². Running track: 14,000–16,000 m². Running track is 2.8× American football field on area.
Related pages
Sources
- Typical range compiled from manufacturer specifications — At One Place