At One Place

Falcon 9 vs International Space Station

Falcon 9 vs International Space Station
Falcon 9 is larger on weight
Falcon 9 is somewhat greater than International Space Station on weight — about 1.3×.

A Falcon 9 and International Space Station can be compared on 2 measures. The figures below are typical adult or full-size values, with the larger of the two in bold.

Side by side

Larger value in bold. Ranges reflect genuine variation, not uncertainty.
Falcon 9 International Space Station
Weight 549.1 t 419.7 t
Typical cost 67,000,000 $ 150,000,000,000 $

What the numbers say

  • Falcon 9 is somewhat greater than International Space Station on weight — about 1.3×.
  • International Space Station is 2,200× Falcon 9 on typical cost.

Weight compared.

Falcon 9 549.1 t
International Space Station 419.7 t

Falcon 9

A partly reusable orbital launch vehicle whose first stage returns to land upright.

International Space Station

A crewed orbital laboratory assembled from 1998, orbiting at about 400 km and circling the Earth every 90 minutes.

This is a comparison of published measurements, nothing more. It describes how two things differ on measures that have been recorded; it does not predict how they would fare against each other in any situation.

Common questions

Which is bigger, Falcon 9 or International Space Station?
Falcon 9 is somewhat greater than International Space Station on weight — about 1.3×. Both figures are typical values; the full range for each is in the table above.
How do Falcon 9s and International Space Stations compare on typical cost?
Falcon 9: 67,000,000 $. International Space Station: 150,000,000,000 $. International Space Station is 2,200× Falcon 9 on typical cost.

Related pages

Sources

  1. Wikidata — Wikimedia Foundation (CC0 1.0)
  2. NASA — National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Public domain (US Government))

How these figures are compiled and checked