Nuclear submarine vs RMS Titanic
Nuclear submarine vs RMS Titanic
RMS Titanic is larger on weight
RMS Titanic is 2.8× nuclear submarine on weight.
A nuclear submarine and RMS Titanic can be compared on 3 measures. The figures below are typical adult or full-size values, with the larger of the two in bold.
Side by side
| Nuclear submarine | RMS Titanic | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 16,760–18,750 t | 52,310 t |
| Length | 170 m | 269.1 m |
| Typical cost | 2,000,000,000 $ | 7,500,000 $ |
What the numbers say
- RMS Titanic is 2.8× nuclear submarine on weight.
- RMS Titanic is 1.6× nuclear submarine on length.
- Nuclear submarine is 270× RMS Titanic on typical cost.
Weight compared.
RMS Titanic 52,310 t
Nuclear submarine 16,760–18,750 t
Nuclear submarine
A US Navy Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine, which can stay submerged for months.
RMS Titanic
A British ocean liner that sank on her maiden voyage in April 1912 with the loss of about 1,500 lives.
This is a comparison of published measurements, nothing more. It describes how two things differ on measures that have been recorded; it does not predict how they would fare against each other in any situation.
Common questions
- Which is bigger, nuclear submarine or RMS Titanic?
- RMS Titanic is 2.8× nuclear submarine on weight. Both figures are typical values; the full range for each is in the table above.
- How do nuclear submarines and RMS Titanics compare on length?
- Nuclear submarine: 170 m. RMS Titanic: 269.1 m. RMS Titanic is 1.6× nuclear submarine on length.
- How do nuclear submarines and RMS Titanics compare on typical cost?
- Nuclear submarine: 2,000,000,000 $. RMS Titanic: 7,500,000 $. Nuclear submarine is 270× RMS Titanic on typical cost.
Related pages
Sources
- Wikidata — Wikimedia Foundation (CC0 1.0)